You are logged in to this journal.
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 1, 053101 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3220701 (29 pages)
Energy use and environmental impacts: A general review
Globally, buildings are responsible for approximately 40% of the total world annual energy consumption. Most of this energy is for the provision of lighting, heating, cooling, and air conditioning. Increasing awareness of the environmental impact of CO2 and NOx emissions and chlorofluorocarbons triggered a renewed interest in environmentally friendly cooling and heating technologies. Under the 1997 Montreal Protocol, governments agreed to phase out chemicals used as refrigerants that have the potential to destroy stratospheric ozone. It was therefore considered desirable to reduce energy consumption and decrease the rate of depletion of world energy reserves and pollution of the environment. One way of reducing building energy consumption is to design buildings that are more economical in their use of energy for heating, lighting, cooling, ventilation, and hot water supply. Passive measures, particularly natural or hybrid ventilation rather than air conditioning, can dramatically reduce primary energy consumption. However, exploitation of renewable energy in buildings and agricultural greenhouses can also significantly contribute toward reducing dependency on fossil fuels. Therefore, promoting innovative renewable applications and reinforcing the renewable energy market will contribute to preservation of the ecosystem by reducing emissions at local and global levels. This will also contribute to the amelioration of environmental conditions by replacing conventional fuels with renewable energies that produce no air pollution or greenhouse gases. The provision of good indoor environmental quality (IEQ) while achieving energy and cost efficient operation of the heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning plants in buildings represents a multivariant problem. The comfort of building occupants is dependent on many environmental parameters including air speed, temperature, relative humidity, and quality in addition to lighting and noise. The overall objective is to provide a high level of building performance, which can be defined as IEQ, energy efficiency (EE), and cost efficiency (CE). IEQ is the perceived condition of comfort that building occupants experience due to the physical and psychological conditions to which they are exposed by their surroundings. The main physical parameters affecting IEQ are air speed, temperature, relative humidity, and quality. EE is related to the provision of the desired environmental conditions while consuming the minimal quantity of energy. CE is the financial expenditure on energy relative to the level of environmental comfort and productivity that the building occupants attained. The overall CE can be improved by improving the IEQ and the EE of a building. The increased availability of reliable and efficient energy services stimulates new development alternatives. Anticipated patterns of future energy use and consequent environmental impacts (acid precipitation, ozone depletion, and greenhouse effect or global warming) are comprehensively discussed in this paper. Throughout the theme several issues relating to renewable energies, environment, and sustainable development are exam-ined from both current and future perspectives. It is concluded that renewable environmentally friendly energy must be encouraged, promoted, implemented, and demonstrated by full-scale plant especially for use in remote rural areas.
© 2009 American Institute of Physics
Article Outline
- INTRODUCTION
- PEOPLE, POWER, AND POLLUTION
- Energy and population growth
- Energy and environmental problems
- Environmental transformations
- SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT
- Environmental aspects
- Wastes
- ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY ASPECTS OF COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY
- Sulfur in fuels and its environmental consequences
- Control of SO2 emissions
- The control of NOx release by combustion processes
- GREEN HEAT
- EFFECTS OF URBAN DENSITY
- Energy efficiency and architectural expression
- Energy efficiency
- Policy recommendations for a sustainable energy future
- CONCLUSIONS
KEYWORDS and PACS
ARTICLE DATA
History
Received 10 September 2008
Accepted 14 August 2009
Published 18 September 2009
Accepted 14 August 2009
Published 18 September 2009
- International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook (OECD, Paris, 1995).
- UK Government, Energy Consumption Guide 19 (ECG019): Energy Efficiency Best Practice Programme (DOE, London, 2000).
- UK Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Best Practice Programme—Introduction to Energy Efficiency in Buildings (DOE, London, 1994).
- E. Bos, T. My, E. Vu, and R. Bulatao, World Population Projection: 1994–95 (John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994) (edition published for the World Bank).
- DEFRA, Energy Resources. Sustainable Development and Environment (DEFRA, Doncaster, 2002).
- M. Levine and M. Hirose, Energy Efficiency Improvement Utilising High Technology: An Assessment of Energy Use in Industry and Buildings. Report and Case Studies (World Energy Council, London, 1995).
- United Nations International Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001) (three volumes).
- J. Parikn, K. Smith, and V. Laxmi, “Indoor air pollution: A reflection on gender bias,” Economic and Political Weekly, 1999.
- UNIDO, “Changing courses sustainable industrial development, as a response to agenda 21,” Vienna, 1997.
- World Resource Institute, World Resources: A Guide to the Global Environment: People and the Environment (WRI, London, 1994).
- T. Boulet, Controlling Air Movement: A Manual for Architects and Builders (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987), pp. 85–138.
- G. Erreygers, in Models of Sustainable Development, edited by S. Faucheux, D. Pearce, and J. Proops (Longman, Cheltenham, 1996).
- S. Meffe, A. Perkson, and O. Trass, Fuel 75, 25 (1996).
- British Standard Institute, “Storage and exhibition archive documents,” BS 5454, London, 1989.
- R. Lazzarin, A. D'Ascanio, and A. Gaspaella, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (SET), Porto, Portugal, 12–14 June 2002 (unpublished), pp. 32–37.
- E. David, The Royal Society of Chemistry 19, 19 (2003).
- A. Zuatori, Jordanian Energy Abstracts 9, 31 (2005).
- G. Anne and S. Michael, Building and Land Management, 5th ed. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2005).
- G. Randal and R. Goyal, Greenhouse Technology (Narosa, New Delhi, 1998).
- I. Yadav and M. Chauadhari, Progressive Floriculture (The House of Sarpan, Bangalore, 1997), pp. 1–5.
- Energy in Building and Industry, Inside Energy: Magazine for Energy Professional (KOPASS, Watford, 1999), pp. 13–14.
- P. Erlich, in Global Climate Change and Life on Earth, edited by R. C. Wyman (Chapman and Hall, London, 1991).
- R. H. Sims, Renewable Energy World 10, 31 (2007).
- A. M. Omer, Proceedings of the Renewable Energy 2008 (RE 2008): Solar Thermal Applications, Busan, South Korea, 13–17 October 2008 (unpublished), Paper No. O.ST-008.
- G. Robinson, “Changes in construction waste management,” Waste Management World, May–June 2007, pp. 43–49.
Figures (click on thumbnails to view enlargements)
Annual and estimated world populations and energy demands (Ref. 24) [in MBDOE (millions of barrels per day of oil equivalent].
FIG. 1 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
World oil productions in the next 10–20 years (Ref. 24).
FIG. 2 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
Volume of oil discovered worldwide (Ref. 25).
FIG. 3 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
Global mean temperature changes over the periods of 1990–2100 and 1990–2030 (Ref. 24).
FIG. 4 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
Link between resources and productivity (Ref. 23).
FIG. 5 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
Comparison of thermal biomass usage options, CHP displacing natural gas as a heat source. 1, large steam power; 2, small steam power; 3, Brayton cycle power; 4, bio-oil conversion power; 5, gasification power; 6, small steam CHP; 7, turboden cycle CHP; 8, entropic cycle CHP.
FIG. 6 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
The life cycle energy balance of corn and switchgrass reveals a paradox: corn as an ethanol feedstock requires less energy for production, i.e., more of the original energy in starch is retained in the ethanol fuel. Nevertheless, the switchgrass process yields higher GHG emissions. This is because most of the process energy for switchgrass process is generated from GHG emission neutral biomass residue. *, 49% actual ethanol energy content, energy content in cattle feed by-product reflects chemical energy content, not life cycle energy displacement. **, energy savings in the refinery due to the higher value of ethanol compared to gasoline.
FIG. 7 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
The variation of distribution factor against particle size for coal undersizes in a classifier. The sizes correspond to midpoint for ranges.
FIG. 8 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
Supply side and demand side management approach for energy.
FIG. 9 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
Exergy-based optimal energy model.
FIG. 10 View Enlargement
| Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
Tables
Table I. EU criteria pollutant standards in the ambiant air environment (Ref. 23).
Table II. Significant EU environmental directives in water, air, and land environments (Ref. 23).
Table III. The external environment (Ref. 23).
Table V. Classifications of data requirements (Ref. 24).
Table VI. Classification of key variables defining facility sustainability (Ref. 24).
Table VII. Energy and sustainable environment (Ref. 24).
Table VIII. Positive impact of durability, adaptability, and energy conservation on economic, social, and environment systems (Ref. 24).
Table IX. The basket of indicators for sustainable consumption and production (Ref. 24).
Table X. Representative sulfur contents of coals (Ref. 13).
Table XII. Particle control techniques (Ref. 25).
Table XIII. Effects of urban density on city’s energy demand (Ref. 25).
Table XIV. Qualities of various energy sources (Ref. 25).




