• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

JRSE has just been upgraded with many new features, including a mobile edition. Feedback is welcome.

You are Logged In You are logged in to this journal.

J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 1, 053104 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3255043 (14 pages)

Reduction of NOx in the exhaust gas of DI- diesel engine fueled with mahua methyl ester along with exhaust gas recirculation

V. Prasad 1,
N. Babu 2,
and B. Rao 3

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, GMR Institute of Technology, Rajam, Andhra Pradesh 532127, India Map This map
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aditya Institute of Technology and Management, Tekkali, Andhra Pradesh 532127, India Map This map
3 Department of Marine Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh 530003, India Map This map

Full Text: Read Online | Download PDF (1.73 MB) | View Cart View Items in Cart
Biodiesels are alternative fuels for petroleum-based diesel without major modifications of engine. In the environmental aspect, also biodiesel gives fewer pollutants than petroleum diesel. However, the NOx level is slightly higher. To reduce NOx, some of the methods are being used, which include direct injection, turbocharging, air-to-air intercooling, combustion optimization with and without swirl support, multivalve cylinder head, advanced high pressure injection system, i.e., split injection or rate shaping, and electronic management system. However, technologies such as exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), soot traps, and exhaust gas after treatment are gaining emphasis to cater to the challenges posed by increasingly stringent environmental emission legislations. In this work, experimentation was conducted on a single cylinder diesel engine with mahua methyl ester (MME) in the neat form along with the cooled EGR and performance, combustion pressure, and emission parameters are collected by using suitable instrumentation. Same experimentation was repeated for the petroleum diesel and a comparison was made to evaluate the applicability of MME along with EGR without major modifications. After the analysis of results, it was found that 5% EGR is recommendable with neat biodiesel (MME) run, and in most of the situations, it proved its merit over neat diesel run.

© 2009 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MME
    1. Transesterification
    2. Preparation of MME
      1. First stage (acid-catalyzed stage)
      2. Second stage (base-catalyzed stage)
      3. Water washing
  3. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND EXPERIMENTATION
    1. EGR system
  4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
    1. Analysis of engine performance and emission analysis
      1. MME with EGR operation
      2. Petroleum diesel with EGR operation
      3. Comparison of MME and petroleum diesel operations
  5. CONCLUSION

ARTICLE DATA

History
Received 12 March 2009
Accepted 6 October 2009
Published 30 October 2009

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:

19417012 (print)  
19417012 (online)

  1. A. Senatore and M. Cardone, SAE 2000 World Congress, Detroit, MI, 6–9 March 2000, Paper No. 2000-01-0691.
  2. A. K. Babu and G. Devaradjane, Proceedings of SAE, 2003, Paper No. 2003-01-0767.
  3. A. K. Agarwal, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 33, 233 (2007).
  4. M. N. Nabi and M. M. Z. Shahadat, SAE Paper, Powertrain and Fluid Systems Conference, Florida, 2004, Paper No. 2004-01-3034.
  5. M. E. Tat, “Investigation of oxides of nitrogen emissions from biodiesel fueled engines,” Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, 2003.
  6. J. B. Heywood, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, International ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988), pp. 572–577.
  7. S. Kimura, O. Aoki, K. Kitahara, and E. Aiyoshizawa, Proceeding of SAE, 2001, Paper No. 2001-01-0200.
  8. S. Kohketsu, K. Mori, K. Sakai, and T. Hakozaki, Proceedings of SAE, 1997, Paper No. SAE 970340.
  9. D. A. Pierpont, D. T. Montgomery, and R. D. Reitz, Proceedings of SAE, 1995, Paper No. 950217.
  10. R. S. G. Baert, D. E. Beckman, and A. Veen, Proceedings of SAE, 1999, Paper No. 1999-01-0837.
  11. U. Lundquist, G. Smedler, and P. Stalhammar, Proceedings of SAE, 2000, Paper No. 2000-01-0226.
  12. A. K. Agrawal, S. K. Singh, S. Sinha, and M. K. Shukl, Sadhana: Proc., Indian Acad. Sci. 29, 275 (2004).
  13. G. H. Abd-Alla, Energy Convers. Manage. 43, 1027 (2002).
  14. N. Ladommatos, S. M. Abdelhalim, H. Zhao, and Z. Hu, SAE International Spring Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Dearborn, MI, 1996 (unpublished), Paper No. 961165.
  15. N. Ladommatos, S. M. Abdelhalim, H. Zhao, and Z. Hu, SAE International Spring Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Dearborn, MI, 1996 (unpublished), Paper No. 961167.
  16. N. Ladommatos, S. M. Abdelhalim, H. Zhao, and Z. Hu, SAE International Spring Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Dearborn, MI, 1997 (unpublished), Paper No. 971659.
  17. R. Diesel, Diesel's Rational Heat Motor (Kissinger Publishing, 1897).
  18. P. Zelenka, H. Aufinger, W. Reczek, and W. Cartellieri, Proceedings of SAE, 1998, Paper No. 980190.
  19. S. Puhan, G. Nagarajan, and B. V. Ramabramhmam, Int. J. Green Energy 4, 89 (2007).

Figures (19) Tables (2)

Figures (click on thumbnails to view enlargements)

FIG. 1
Free fatty acids breaks off with acid treatment.
FIG. 1 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 2
Schematic arrangement of the engine test bed and instrumentation.
FIG. 2 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 3
EGR system.
FIG. 3 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 4
Brake specific fuel consumption vs brake power at neat MME along with different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 4 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 5
Brake thermal efficiency vs brake power at neat MME along with different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 5 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 6
Exhaust gas temperature vs EGR graph at different loads with MME.
FIG. 6 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 7
NO vs EGR graph at different loads with MME.
FIG. 7 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 8
Pressure vs crank angle graph at full load with MME+different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 8 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 9
HCs vs EGR graph at different Loads with MME.
FIG. 9 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 10
Carbon monoxide vs EGR graph at different loads with MME.
FIG. 10 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 11
Free oxygen vs EGR graph at different loads with MME.
FIG. 11 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 12
Smoke value vs EGR graph at different loads with MME.
FIG. 12 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 13
Brake specific fuel consumption vs brake power graph at diesel along with different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 13 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 14
Brake specific fuel consumption vs equivalence ratio graph at diesel along with different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 14 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 15
Brake thermal efficiency vs brake power at diesel along with different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 15 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 16
Nitric oxide vs EGR graph at different loads at diesel along with different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 16 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 17
HCs vs EGR graph at different loads with diesel.
FIG. 17 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 18
Carbon monoxide vs EGR graph at different loads with diesel.
FIG. 18 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)
FIG. 19
Pressure vs crank angle graph at full load with diesel+different percentages of EGR.
FIG. 19 View Enlargement | Download High Resolution Image (.zip file)

Tables

Table I. Properties of diesel and MME.
Table II. Specifications of the didiesel engine.

Close
Close Map Window

Advertising Info